IHC takes up Imaan, Hadi’s appeals against framing of charges in security breach case

Changes detected 1

The outlet changed this story after we captured it. We keep the previous version, its fingerprint and the date we saw the change.

1. Excerpt · detected on 19/10/2026 12:07 UTC

   ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday took up appeals filed by human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, against an anti-terrorism court (ATC) order rejecting their petitions challenging the framing of charges and the inclusion of terrorism-related provisions in the security breach case . The case pertains to the alleged disruption of the security route of an international cricket team and incitement to public unrest. A division bench comprising Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas and Justice Shahrukh Arjumand heard the matter, matter on Monday, with Riasat Ali Azad, Zainab Janjua and other lawyers appearing before the court. At the outset, Justice Minhas asked whether the accused had received copies of the re Zai

   See versions and fingerprints

   Before: «ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday took up appeals filed by human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, against an anti-terrorism court (ATC) order rejecting their petitions challenging the framing of charges and the inclusion of terrorism-related provisions in the security breach case . A division bench comprising Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas and Justice Shahrukh Arjumand heard the matter, with Riasat Ali Azad, Zainab Janjua and other lawyers appearing before the court. At the outset, Justice Minhas asked whether the accused had received copies of the re» 07f85edb5edd

   After: «ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday took up appeals filed by human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, against an anti-terrorism court (ATC) order rejecting their petitions challenging the framing of charges and the inclusion of terrorism-related provisions in the security breach case . The case pertains to the alleged disruption of the security route of an international cricket team and incitement to public unrest. A division bench comprising Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas and Justice Shahrukh Arjumand heard the matter on Monday, with Riasat Ali Azad, Zai» 10e28f3ed8da